| 1 |
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 22:40:40 -0800 |
| 2 |
"C. Brewer" <cbrewer@×××××××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I apologize for the top-post, but its getting long. I second the |
| 5 |
> motion for parallelized execution, but would like to go one better: |
| 6 |
> named run-levels! I spoke with seemant about this quite a few times, |
| 7 |
> but it appears our volunteer was too busy:) I think this is worth a |
| 8 |
> glance: www.winterdrache.de/linux/newboot |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Actually we do have 'named' runlevels. We only really use the runlevels |
| 12 |
from init to get the system to boot or shutdown. From there you just |
| 13 |
define your runlevel (may it be named 'home', 'work', whatever) in |
| 14 |
/etc/runlevels, and execute: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
# /sbin/rc work |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
for instance. Sure, it may need some improvements, but why don't we |
| 19 |
*rather* work on that, than reinvent the wheel ? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 27 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives