| 1 |
On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:44 +0200 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are |
| 5 |
> a lot as I have seen running: |
| 6 |
> grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v |
| 7 |
> eutils |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when |
| 10 |
> an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwise |
| 11 |
> this problem could reappear if some other eclass no longer inherit it in |
| 12 |
> the future :-/ |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Maybe we should make eutils inheritance implicit so all ebuilds get epatch |
| 15 |
and friends automatically. Is there really that much overhead? Or am I |
| 16 |
missing something obvious? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
fonts, gcc-porting |
| 21 |
toolchain, wxwidgets |
| 22 |
@ gentoo.org |
Archives