1 |
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:29:13 +0100 |
2 |
Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > "Have you pointed this out to DevRel? What was their reaction?" |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > does not seem to have this mis-hearing problem, at least not to me. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> Hmm - thats interesting, I subconsciously read the two questions into |
9 |
> the one posted. I accept you point. Its something I am likely to |
10 |
> write myself without thinking about it too much too. |
11 |
|
12 |
Oh, this is a good one. Without introducing the problem, it is being |
13 |
assured that devrel has a problem because (some?) Gentoo users have a |
14 |
problem. So I ask very straightforwardly when this was pointed out to |
15 |
devrel, because I don't see the information being introduced to the |
16 |
wider public that has led to this public e-mail accusing devrel of not |
17 |
doing their job. Excuse me please, but how did I not turn out to ask |
18 |
the right question about the information that wasn't exposed on a |
19 |
public mailing list? And if I did put a vitriolic spin on it, then how |
20 |
would you sanctify your actions that bypassed normal procedure without |
21 |
actually at least summarising how that procedure ran to a dead end? |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
Regards, |
25 |
jer |