Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing separate "security supported" arch list | ||
| Date: | Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:17:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAJ0EP43i0rsLN0c6gtz7HPFbDM_UMuraHac7VS=XB81e-1szBg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing separate "security supported" arch list by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:05 AM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > 4. In the end, Security team isn't really respecting this policy. |
| 3 | > In the end, this leads to absurdities like GLSA being released before |
| 4 | > a package is stable on amd64, and confusing the users [4]. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | This is certainly an absurd mistake, but I think it is unrelated to |
| 7 | the topic of your message. It looks like Whissi jumped the gun on |
| 8 | releasing a GLSA, which could happen regardless of the policy. Am I |
| 9 | missing some context? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing separate "security supported" arch list | Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> |