Archives
Archives
| From: | Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
| Date: | Wed, 23 May 2012 19:38:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAO38tUqkqDuW4Ld+7ZRWY75NKTJaa1t3nKv_kpA4Npae8jwiXQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" |
||
| 1 | I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git |
| 2 | Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init systems |
| 3 | and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, and it's |
| 4 | good enough for you. |
| 5 | -- |
| 6 | Arun Raghavan |
| 7 | http://arunraghavan.net/ |
| 8 | (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> |