| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 5 |
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst) kirjoitti: |
| 6 |
>> Perhaps we should just move DESCRIPTIONs to metadata. That would make it |
| 7 |
>> impossible to use ${PV} and more importantly also remove some duplication. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> <shortdescription> |
| 10 |
> </shortdescription> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> sounds like something for EAPI-1 |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186454 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
right, we can just get rid of DESCIRPTION |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 19 |
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:06:40 +0300 |
| 20 |
> Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 21 |
>> But is there anything that makes use of version specific DESCRIPTION |
| 22 |
>> atoms? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Yep. Have a look at sys-devel/gcc for example. Some versions include |
| 25 |
> various extensions, and say so in DESCRIPTION. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
and put details like this in <longdescription>. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Marijn |
| 30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) |
| 32 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
iD8DBQFGpfZZp/VmCx0OL2wRAqnsAJ4s1QCF2X+DZlxupyRjLGm3getRVwCeMrmx |
| 35 |
bwX7qP5PeseQ4B8ypNIcQIA= |
| 36 |
=V04j |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives