Archives
Archives
| From: | Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: toolchain.eclass prefix support | ||
| Date: | Sun, 08 Jan 2017 05:01:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 87lgumywko.fsf_-_@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain.eclass prefix support by Mike Gilbert |
||
| 1 | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Regarding the PATH/gcc-config change, I'm thinking it would make more |
| 4 | > sense to drop the env -i command than to add to he list of special |
| 5 | > variables we pass through to it. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | All the env -i has been introduced in this commit by vapier in 2005: |
| 8 | |
| 9 | https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo/historical.git/commit/?id=a8a64d1886cc5c9f975353b97237f2900a3ee88c |
| 10 | |
| 11 | "clean up/simplify the gcc-config and fix_libtool_files logic". The |
| 12 | reasonale was "clean-up". |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | "ROOT=${ROOT}" was added in 2007 by vapier, |
| 16 | |
| 17 | https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo/historical.git/commit/?id=7d9f89700a2ee50674c0d871ec6d21b468ac6206 |
| 18 | |
| 19 | "cleanup gcc-config logic so that it doesnt matter what the ROOT value |
| 20 | is". The reasonale was "cleanup gcc-config logic" |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | So, from the two historical commits, it is safe to drop env -i without |
| 24 | breaking anything sacred. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | Benda |