1 |
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:24:14 -0400 |
2 |
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:46:43 -0400 |
5 |
> > Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >> Now how in the world do you pull a depend that needs to be merged |
8 |
> >> AFTER the original package? |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > You make the after package DEPEND upon the before package. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> except the user only has to emerge ABC, and as such XYZ needs to be |
13 |
> pulled in but AFTER ABC gets emerged. Your answer does not handle |
14 |
> that situation. It's OBVIOUS (and in all cases in the tree) XYZ |
15 |
> already DEPENDs on ABC. |
16 |
|
17 |
ABC: PDEPEND="XYX" |
18 |
XYZ: DEPEND="ABC" |
19 |
|
20 |
That's all that's needed to force correct ordering. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Ciaran McCreesh |