| 1 |
On 06/11/2017 05:17 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 2 |
>> We can always patch the eclass at that point if that is still a big |
| 3 |
>> concern, but I fundamentally agree with William on this, starting |
| 4 |
>> point |
| 5 |
>> should be fixing it upstream, so can start with a tracking bug on |
| 6 |
>> affected packages. |
| 7 |
> That's a complete useless waste of time, to track some ancient packages |
| 8 |
> that don't get any upstream update anyway. The active ones have updated |
| 9 |
> it long ago. And it'd be a joke to propose last riting for the reason |
| 10 |
> of a file being named configure.in instead of configure.ac. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That determination can be made on a package-by-package basis and fixed |
| 15 |
in ebuild if needed. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 19 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 20 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives