| 1 |
Fernando J. Pereda wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:58:28PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:09:27 +0800 |
| 5 |
>>> Zhang Le <r0bertz@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> IMHO, what is more ridiculous is keeping ask other to be quiet in a |
| 7 |
>>>> discussion which is supposed to be open to everyone who cares about |
| 8 |
>>>> it. |
| 9 |
>>> It's open to anyone who cares about it and is knowledgeable enough to |
| 10 |
>>> provide informed commentary. Anything else is just noise. |
| 11 |
>> At least not to tell others to be quiet. |
| 12 |
>> It is a discussion after all. |
| 13 |
>> We can let them become knowledgeable, at least we should try. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Heh... unfortunately this is gentoo and this behaviour is tolerated. Try |
| 16 |
> to go with this same thing to the lkml[*1*]. Ask them to teach you C so |
| 17 |
> you can contribute with your opinion to every single patch and design |
| 18 |
> decision that is made. Then tell them they should teach you stuff about |
| 19 |
> OS design because you _are_entitled_ an opinion, then .... [then, sane |
| 20 |
> people see how this approach gets silly] |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I have mailed my patch to LKML. So I know the situation there. |
| 23 |
Linux kernel community has a kernelnewbie mailing list. But we don't have one. |
| 24 |
We don't even have enough docs to educate our future potential package manager |
| 25 |
maintainer. Note I am not blaming anyone there. |
| 26 |
Let's start from ourselves. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Zhang Le, Robert |
| 30 |
GPG key ID: 1E4E2973 |
| 31 |
Fingerprint: 0260 C902 B8F8 6506 6586 2B90 BC51 C808 1E4E 2973 |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives