| 1 |
On Monday, August 23, 2010 16:25:37 Torsten Veller wrote: |
| 2 |
> * "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" <vapier@g.o>: |
| 3 |
> > Log: |
| 4 |
> > Add proper blockers to old split packages #274443. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > RDEPEND="virtual/perl-Scalar-List-Utils |
| 7 |
> > >=virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-${PV} |
| 8 |
> > - >=virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-${PV}" |
| 9 |
> > + >=virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-${PV} |
| 10 |
> > + !perl-core/Compress-Zlib |
| 11 |
> > + !perl-core/IO-Compress-Zlib |
| 12 |
> > + !perl-core/IO-Compress-Bzip2 |
| 13 |
> > + !perl-core/IO-Compress-Base" |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> How long do you think the blockers should exist? |
| 16 |
> 12 months ago they were removed from perl-core. |
| 17 |
> 16 months ago they were moved from dev-perl to perl-core. Do you want to |
| 18 |
> block them too? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
i re-added them because i just hit them on a box that while not kept up-to- |
| 21 |
date every week, i wouldnt consider "old". i also dont think the "12 months" |
| 22 |
quote there fully encapsulates the time frame of things being in stable. this |
| 23 |
box certainly was up-to-date less than 12 months ago and it apparently missed |
| 24 |
this blocker time frame. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
personally, i'd let these blockers sit for quite some time since it is really |
| 27 |
no overhead and doesnt require maintenance. |
| 28 |
-mike |
Archives