1 |
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 00:29 +0000, David Leverton wrote: |
2 |
> On 14 March 2012 23:44, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > Oh, and somehow "consensus" will work? No, sorry, it will not. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> No, logical analysis will, as I said in the rest of my post which you |
6 |
> conveniently ignored - either we conclude with evidence that there are |
7 |
> no issues, which should settle the matter for reasonable people, or we |
8 |
> discover that there are, in which case they have to be dealt with one |
9 |
> way or another. I really don't see how anyone can object to that, |
10 |
> unless they're worried they won't like the result.... |
11 |
> |
12 |
> > How about the basic FACT that today, such systems do not work |
13 |
> |
14 |
> This is debatable at best. You can keep screaming "but bluetooth |
15 |
> won't work!" until you're blue in the face, but that's not relevant at |
16 |
> all to people who don't use bluetooth. |
17 |
|
18 |
That's true, but given the need to have a "one size fits all" boot |
19 |
system(for obvious practical reasons), such boot system needs to work |
20 |
with bluetooth input devices |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix |
24 |
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. |
25 |
http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib |