1 |
Not everyone can patch them, more people would be capable of writing |
2 |
half-baked hacks that resolve most of the issues. |
3 |
|
4 |
Anyway I guess the new baselayout sounds promising here. |
5 |
|
6 |
> My point is that Snort and Apache are not alone in this, so I suppose |
7 |
> quite a few upstream developers just disagree with us on what proper |
8 |
> initialization means. Why should our users suffer? |
9 |
|
10 |
They shouldn't, but that doesn't mean implementing some half-baked hack |
11 |
to resolve the situation. It might be better to instead patch the |
12 |
daemon in question and send the patches upstream. Upstream developers |
13 |
(usually) are much more willing to make changes when you've done the |
14 |
work for them... ;] |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |