| 1 |
Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> >> I proxy maintain bitcoins for luke-jr. He wants to propose a patch |
| 3 |
> >> against the bitcoin eclass. The following is his proposed change. |
| 4 |
> >> I'll commit it after review. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Please do not do that, Anthony. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I don't have time nor the familiarity to properly maintain bitcoins |
| 9 |
> myself. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Understood, and no problem. I think it's especially important to be a |
| 12 |
bit conservative under those circumstances. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I will ignore all negative advice regarding this package unless it is |
| 16 |
> balanced with positive advice. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
That's cool. I tried to also be constructive in my mail - sorry if |
| 19 |
that didn't get through. I was saying that the patched version should |
| 20 |
probably be a separate ebuild. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
But Mathy's (sorry for the mistype in my last mail Mathy) suggestion |
| 23 |
to go ahead with renaming the USE flag but *not* flipping it to |
| 24 |
default on is also a good step. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> Please point out what lines of the patch should be changed and what |
| 28 |
> they should be changed to, else I will commit the patch as |
| 29 |
> provided. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
All lines containing +knots should say knots instead. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Thanks! |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
//Peter |
Archives