| 1 |
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:04:10 +0300 |
| 2 |
Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 07/01/2010 11:00 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
> >[...] |
| 6 |
> > The way to control compiler flags in Gentoo is CFLAGS. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That is true. However, there's a problem; you can control package |
| 9 |
> options of individual packages with USE flags, but you can't control |
| 10 |
> compilation switches of individual packages with CFLAGS. This will |
| 11 |
> naturally make people feel like using USE flags to modify compilation |
| 12 |
> options is a good idea. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Surely, one has to sympathize with this mindset even though it's a wrong |
| 15 |
> thing to do. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
We've had per-package CFLAGS for quite a long time now. Maybe we need to |
| 18 |
advertise this a little more? There would certainly be a market for some |
| 19 |
util to manage all the per-package options that we have scattered around in |
| 20 |
different config files. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
fonts, gcc-porting, and it's all by design |
| 25 |
toolchain, wxwidgets to keep us from losing our minds |
| 26 |
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives