1 |
On Sun, 26 May 2013 04:02:56 +0200 |
2 |
Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> By take effect I mean that the filesystem should be modified in such |
5 |
> a way that the next boot will use what I selected. No further action |
6 |
> which could fail should be required beyond the eselect command. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Unless the eselect command has successfully modified the filesystem I |
9 |
> can't really know that my system will boot with what I have selected, |
10 |
> ie. eselect does not provide any useful feedback, because it can not. |
11 |
|
12 |
That's exactly what I've described in another mail in another subthread. |
13 |
|
14 |
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/85778/focus=85789 |
15 |
|
16 |
Snippet of what I said: |
17 |
|
18 |
> Sounds like we would have two files like 'current_init' and |
19 |
> 'boot_init' and `eselect init ...` would update 'boot_init'. Then, |
20 |
> the first `init` invocation on boot would update 'current_init' with |
21 |
> the value of 'boot_init'; latter `init` invocations can then read out |
22 |
> 'current_init', which is not to be touched by `eselect init ...`. |
23 |
|
24 |
This assumes that you would be working with a wrapper, not a symlink. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
With kind regards, |
28 |
|
29 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
30 |
Gentoo Developer |
31 |
|
32 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
33 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
34 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |