Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: hardened glibc and gcc dependencies | ||
| Date: | Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:51:42 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAJaTeToh=qQ4ZKbSbnmSeKsfOboqFg5_dRVY1WTrTDu0b3cvyA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: hardened glibc and gcc dependencies by Ryan Hill |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 01:47, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 2 | > On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:03:12 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 3 | >> So, I honestly see no reason why toolchain should not start using EAPI 2. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > I await your patch to toolchain.eclass. :P |
| 6 | |
| 7 | i wouldn't bother as it's most likely not going to be accepted at this time |
| 8 | |
| 9 | (i haven't kept up-to-date with the hardened threads as i'm traveling atm) |
| 10 | -mike |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: hardened glibc and gcc dependencies | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: hardened glibc and gcc dependencies | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |