1 |
On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 11:29, Mikael Andersson wrote: |
2 |
> This is only an initial suggestion, please comment and improve :) |
3 |
> |
4 |
> 1) Successful Emerges/Bugs |
5 |
> a) Count package downloads and bugs filed. If no blocker/critical bugs |
6 |
> exists after a week or two mark as stable. For important packages this rule |
7 |
> could be made more stringent. |
8 |
> b) Count real merges/unmerges of packages and not only package downloads, |
9 |
> this should to opt-in since it would in some way need to post information |
10 |
> back to gentoo.org |
11 |
> |
12 |
> 2) Voting console |
13 |
> A console application which finds all stable packages installed more than |
14 |
> a week or two ago and asks you to determine how much you've used them. |
15 |
> As default it only needs to show packages with few users since simple |
16 |
> statistics should be enough to validate packages with many users. At the |
17 |
> end of the emerge remind a user of 'unpopular' packages to run the voting |
18 |
> console to mark as stable. |
19 |
|
20 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12785 was opened at the end of |
21 |
December. Blizzy left the dev team and currently there's no one in |
22 |
charge of gentoo-stable and gentoo-stats as far as I know - the position |
23 |
is still open. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
|
27 |
Alec Berryman <alec@×××××××××.org> |