Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:36:43
Message-Id: 4ECE725F.30307@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date by "Paweł Hajdan
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 24/11/11 10:17 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
5 > On 11/23/11 3:27 PM, Torsten Veller wrote:
6 >> What do you expect to happen with bugs assigned to maintainer-needed?
7 >
8 > I'm going to CC arches myself after a while, similarly as with bugs with
9 > other maintainers who don't respond.
10
11 ..should ~arch packages with no maintainer really be moved to stable?*
12
13 (* assuming no other outside forces, like it's a dep of something else
14 that needs to go stable)
15
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
18
19 iF4EAREIAAYFAk7Ocl8ACgkQAJxUfCtlWe3cnAEAvrKaV3pQUhIzaeXUEJzHpnuA
20 T57cwKlAMTqgrSWDCpoBANMi0uFU+Nr9FvFkj/w8shcsPjmNS5csOPyDNhbbJVTt
21 =cTIU
22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>