Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:36:43
Message-Id: 4ECE725F.30307@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date by "Paweł Hajdan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 24/11/11 10:17 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 11/23/11 3:27 PM, Torsten Veller wrote: >> What do you expect to happen with bugs assigned to maintainer-needed? > > I'm going to CC arches myself after a while, similarly as with bugs with > other maintainers who don't respond.
..should ~arch packages with no maintainer really be moved to stable?* (* assuming no other outside forces, like it's a dep of something else that needs to go stable) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk7Ocl8ACgkQAJxUfCtlWe3cnAEAvrKaV3pQUhIzaeXUEJzHpnuA T57cwKlAMTqgrSWDCpoBANMi0uFU+Nr9FvFkj/w8shcsPjmNS5csOPyDNhbbJVTt =cTIU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>