| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:40:07 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" |
| 3 |
> <flameeyes@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | This is a discussion to follow up bug #149508 [1]. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149536#c4 |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
If I were you, I'd rather not mention that bug. Really don't see what |
| 9 |
you are trying to say here with that link. Plus kindly note |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> *Important: do NOT use this thread for considerations on QA behaviour, |
| 12 |
> this is NOT what this post is thought for.* |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
in the original mail. So now if you could move to the points mentioned |
| 15 |
by Flameeyes in his email, it would be really useful. Additionally, it |
| 16 |
would be nice if these discussions involved concerned arches and were |
| 17 |
not done ex post in future cases. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thanks. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Jakub Moc |
| 26 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 27 |
GPG signature: |
| 28 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 29 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives