| 1 |
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 14:28:02 Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12/06/2011 10:04 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > what might be interesting is if we had a "Gentoo default" set which is |
| 4 |
> > what would come in a stage3 rather than the current "stage3 is the |
| 5 |
> > system set". then we could move virtual/ssh out of the system set and |
| 6 |
> > into the "Gentoo default" set so it'd be easier for people to |
| 7 |
> > drop/etc... but i'm not familiar enough with the portage support atm to |
| 8 |
> > say how feasible such an idea would be. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Similar to how we use packages.build to define the stage1 set, we could |
| 11 |
> add a packages.default to define the stage3 set. Alternatively, we could |
| 12 |
> use a meta-package to pull in the defaults, and adjust the stage3 build |
| 13 |
> to pull in that meta-package automatically. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
the packages.default sounds like a good idea as then we'd be able to |
| 16 |
tweak/stack it on a per-profile basis like existing files. i'll file a release |
| 17 |
bug on the topic, and then we can talk about moving virtual/ssh out of system |
| 18 |
and into that. |
| 19 |
-mike |
Archives