| 1 |
On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 18:26, Daniel Armyr wrote: |
| 2 |
> > My point is just this, you want access to -core, become a developer, |
| 3 |
> > its part of the territory. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Yeah, and if I want to know how my government makes descisions on how my life |
| 6 |
> is run I can allways become a high-ranking politician. At this point in time, |
| 7 |
> Gentoo simply does not have an open culture, but a closed one. I am fore an |
| 8 |
> read-only core, but when reading this thread I have a nagging suspicion that |
| 9 |
> this is pointless. The Gentoo devs want to have an ivory tower, and ivory towers |
| 10 |
> can not be scaled. The only way to change is for the inhabitants to come out freely. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > And I might be going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure that many |
| 13 |
> > other non-profit Linux distributions have non-open lists. In fact, I |
| 14 |
> > would be very surprised if any Linux distributions don't. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> And since then was that an excuse? I thought Gentoo wanted to be better than other distros. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I am guessing you consult your children in all decisions you make |
| 19 |
regarding them (if you have any)? Or if you are a manager, do you |
| 20 |
consult with your workers in decisions you make ? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 27 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives