Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Yet another few ideas for Portage
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:23:17
Message-Id: 20040414212314.GA22022@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Yet another few ideas for Portage by tom@edgeoftheinterweb.org.uk
1 On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 10:17:08PM +0100, tom@×××××××××××××××××××××.uk wrote:
2 > Hey all,
3 >
4 > This is just a few ideas I've been bouncing around some of the ops on
5 > #gentoo. This is what I have so far:
6 >
7 > - "I depend on X package with Y USE flag" functionality. Think of
8 > problems with packages that need certain support in imlib, and the
9 > mozilla/epiphany problem. It's a long way off because new syntax would
10 > be needed, and as Genone told me, "new syntax -> new problems -> more
11 > testing" :)
12 >
13
14 This one's in the works 8)
15
16 --
17 Jon Portnoy
18 avenj/irc.freenode.net
19
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list