| 1 |
Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 14:23 +0100, Markus Nigbur wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 14:00 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>>On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 13:38:53 +0100 |
| 7 |
>>>Fabian Zeindl <fabian.zeindl@×××.at> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>>>Hi |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>>I startet a discussion a time ago about new use flag explanations in |
| 13 |
>>>>ebuilds: |
| 14 |
>>>>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/618 |
| 15 |
>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>>Can anyone tell me whether this is going to be implemented? |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>>As I said, this has to be done in metadata.xml (and not in ebuilds) and |
| 19 |
>>>so far the DTD isn't changed. Paul, any news on this? |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>>Marius |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>>That's one of those things that should be easy to establish and result |
| 25 |
>>in a huge benefit for everyone. I'd probably the first who hacks |
| 26 |
>>detailed descriptions for every flag my maintained packages have. |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>>If the only thing that prevents the implementation from being realized, |
| 29 |
>>is lack of time or lack of man power, feel free to contact me. |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Sounds more like a PITA to me, but I wont object out of that |
| 34 |
> principal :] |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
What's a PITA? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
fabian |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Musik kann nicht illegal sein: www.fairsharing.de |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
I prefer signed/encrypted Mail: |
| 44 |
http://stud3.tuwien.ac.at/~e0327380/pub_key.asc |
| 45 |
Fingerprint: CFE8 38A7 0BC4 3CB0 E454 FA8D 04F9 B3B6 E02D 25BA |
Archives