| 1 |
On 12/28/2013 03:44 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
>>>> That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate, |
| 4 |
>>>> you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff. |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able |
| 7 |
>>> to address. You should raise this issue with them rather than |
| 8 |
>>> accusing each other on the lists. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> I completely agree with this. I feel that this thread is a sign that |
| 11 |
>> there is a problem on how the new QA communicates problems with the |
| 12 |
>> developers that cause them. I read the entire thread and I still don't |
| 13 |
>> think there is an agreement on who broke the tree and why. Would a |
| 14 |
>> private discussion be better before going publicly with accusations? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Introducing repoman warnings deliberately is wrong. Point. |
| 17 |
> QA can do trivial fixes. Point. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> None of these two points needs any discussion. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
Certainly, but look at the size and contents of this thread and now tell |
| 22 |
me if what you said is clear to everyone. It certainly isn't to the |
| 23 |
person who caused the problem so what I am saying is that maybe it's |
| 24 |
better first to communicate the problem with him before starting a |
| 25 |
public heated discussion. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
Markos Chandras |
Archives