| 1 |
Dan Meltzer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 1/28/07, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Dan Meltzer wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do? |
| 5 |
>> > |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Top posting... |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Any way the thing was that the only change in these ebuilds are the |
| 10 |
>> eclasses/eclass functions used and the new eclasses have been proven |
| 11 |
>> stable already. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Regards, |
| 14 |
>> Petteri |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> okay, i'll bottom post this time just for variety. From opfers post |
| 18 |
> it sounded like he was proposing to allow this for all packages (not |
| 19 |
> just java). I was enquiring after that. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Yeah, just wanted to give the background that started this discussion. I |
| 23 |
agree that we should not start loosening the policy ligthly. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Petteri |
Archives