| 1 |
On Sunday, June 12, 2011 17:16:08 Francesco R wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2011/6/11 Mike Frysinger: |
| 3 |
> > On Saturday, June 11, 2011 16:24:00 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:58:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> > > So, effectively the QA team lead can appoint the people who elect |
| 6 |
> >> > > him. I'm not at all implying that Diego would abuse his position, |
| 7 |
> >> > > but still I think that this is not a sane situation. |
| 8 |
> >> > |
| 9 |
> >> > it does seem trivial to remove people who disagree with you and thus |
| 10 |
> >> > cement an echo chamber |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> Are you talking in a hypothetical future situation, or has this already |
| 13 |
> >> happened? If so, can you point to an example of where Diego's been |
| 14 |
> >> removing people for disagreeing with him, rather than for disagreeing |
| 15 |
> >> with the Council? |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > how is disagreeing with a Council decision valid grounds either ? |
| 18 |
> > punting people because they disagree with any group isn't really valid. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> If you are in the role of enforcing decision of the council and with |
| 21 |
> "disagreeing" you mean acting versus their decision yes it's a very |
| 22 |
> much valid ground. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
i never said acting against council decisions, and neither did Ciaran, and so |
| 25 |
far, no one has shown me doing such a thing |
| 26 |
-mike |
Archives