Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:47:11
Message-Id: 4DEF45EE.3050101@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild by "Michał Górny"
On 06/08/11 11:43, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:28:47 +0200 > Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:27, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> >> wrote: >>> In all cases I want one resource to look at, viewcvs is a horrible >>> and slow interface. So it does make sense to keep changelogs filled >>> with information - maybe automation is needed, I don't have a >>> strong opinion either way. But don't make me do more work because >>> you are lazy, that never ends well. >> >> IMO we should just make repoman commit update the ChangeLog. > > What if we wanted to remove ChangeLogs then for autogeneration? Will we > require all devs to quickly update their portage versions? >
Just make committing the ChangeLog fatal on the server side ;) There are enough ways to get it done ... -- Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds