| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:48:54 +0100
|
| 5 |
Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Dne 27.1.2011 17:30, Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): |
| 8 |
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:19:51 -0600 |
| 9 |
> > Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote: |
| 10 |
> >> Probably OT, sorry. Isn't it time we gained this concept of |
| 11 |
> >> "noarch" for packages that only install text files or packages |
| 12 |
> >> that don't compile anything... |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > No, since there's no such thing as an app that's guaranteed to be |
| 15 |
> > portable. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> Yeah like ebuild consisting of one posix-sh script or ebuild that |
| 18 |
> installs only png files... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Well, a posix-sh script might still call software which is not that
|
| 21 |
portable. If we do a thing like that, we would probably need to
|
| 22 |
reconsider the concept of package stabilization (due to dependencies).
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
- --
|
| 25 |
Best regards,
|
| 26 |
Michał Górny
|
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk1Bo4QACgkQnGSe5QXeB7tSOQCfckhD3sw+7moGcgKVbOzy83Qp
|
| 31 |
pgsAnjtKhhlfzVZ5uHAFPDM401MV6a3+
|
| 32 |
=Be5Q
|
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives