| 1 |
Danny van Dyk wrote: [Mon Apr 03 2006, 06:40:59PM CDT] |
| 2 |
> Well, you're wrong. I'm against this conduct in its current form and I |
| 3 |
> am no terrorist. Further, i really dislike how you tried to avoid |
| 4 |
> public discussion by deeming everyone who disagrees as a terrorist. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
You know, to the best of my knowledge vapier is not a person who engages |
| 7 |
in underhanded tricks. My suspicion is that he was not trying to avoid |
| 8 |
discussion, but that he truly thought the proposed code of conduct would |
| 9 |
be uncontroversial. (Perhaps one should add to such a code: "Give devs |
| 10 |
the benefit of the doubt; ask what is meant instead of merely assuming |
| 11 |
that your interpretation is correct If nothing else, it helps limit |
| 12 |
escalation.") |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-g2boojum- |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 17 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 18 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 19 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 20 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives