| 1 |
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:36:30 +0100 |
| 2 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Some packages have new releases more than once a month and sometimes it's reasonable |
| 5 |
> to not skip stabilization of any version. Given version of a package is usually no |
| 6 |
> longer tested by users after release of a newer version, so I suggest the following |
| 7 |
> change to the policy of stabilizations: |
| 8 |
> Stabilization of given version of a package can be requested if this version has been |
| 9 |
> in the tree for at least 10 days and a newer version of this package has been added |
| 10 |
> to the tree. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I thought the arch teams were already overworked. Why do you need every last |
| 13 |
version stable? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. |
| 18 |
gcc-porting, |
| 19 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives