Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:29:27
Message-Id:	`CA+czFiAGohHZxt2Kn2zvW2q944pWeK7graRFNbF5o-TQ-SUA_Q@mail.gmail.com`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012) by Greg KH

1	On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote:
2	> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:08:38PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
3	>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:08:52AM -0800, Greg KH wrote
4	>>
5	>> > Again, any specific pointer to a commit in the tree that caused this?
6	>>
7	>> See http://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Udev/upgrade&redirect=no
8	>> Comments?
9	>
10	> As I don't know who made those wiki changes, I don't know, but this
11	> seems to be a choice made by the gentoo udev maintainers, not
12	> necessarily the upstream developer's choice.
13
14	http://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Udev/upgrade&action=history
15	http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Astaecker
16
17	Best ask him, I suppose.
18
19	--
20	:wq

Subject	Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)	Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>