Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] New PDEPEND behaviour. | ||
| Date: | Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:23:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070725151701.56599dd8@snowflake | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] New PDEPEND behaviour. by Carsten Lohrke |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:51:55 +0200 |
| 2 | Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > And I'm pretty sure nearly everyone using PDEPEND in his ebuilds |
| 4 | > relies on Portage building the PDEPEND not before the ebuild, which |
| 5 | > lists it. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | And I'm pretty sure they don't, since they have the post package |
| 8 | DEPENDing upon the pre package anyway. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] New PDEPEND behaviour. | Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> |