1 |
Dnia 2015-01-26, o godz. 07:18:13 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:37:09 +0100 |
6 |
> > Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> >> > media-video/mplayer2 or media-video/mpv may be used as a more |
9 |
> >> > modern replacement. |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> Don't recommend mplayer2, afaik it's dead. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Also, I'd drop "modern" from there: I don't see much more modernity in |
14 |
> > those forks except maybe younger maintainers :) |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Is there an exhaustive list of packages that don't work with one or |
18 |
> the other? I don't think I've noticed anything I couldn't install for |
19 |
> a lack of libav. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I suggest just cutting the subjective parts out of the last paragraph: |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Please also note that some packages support only one of the two |
24 |
> implementations. An attempt to install one of those packages will result |
25 |
> in blockers unless the user changes the global USE=libav state. The most |
26 |
> notable example of such package is media-video/mplayer. media-video/mplayer2 or |
27 |
> media-video/mpv may be used as replacements for users who prefer to use libav. |
28 |
|
29 |
Thanks, applied your suggestions. Please read now ;). |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Best regards, |
33 |
Michał Górny |