Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

[Michael Hammer]

* Jan Kundrát <jkt@g.o> [080915 11:51]:
> Michael Hammer wrote:
>> But for me it's still questionable why we don't have a gentoo project
>> for this important task?
>
> You mean something like http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/pms.xml ?

Definitely not ;) I am missing content like:

- responsible devs
- a link to the document source
- the procedure description how the PMS is created
- summary of the history with the core changes for each release (EAPI)
aso.

All this API discussion has a bit of an "only for members" character
for me which is IMHO not the way it should be. I am pretty well
knowing that writing documentation is a big effort but that's what you
have to do if you want to create a standard. I also think that you
have to define procedures for modification, evaluation and decision
on drafts like we have for GLEPs.

The next point I am missing is a clean assignment of authority and
responsibility. That's of course clear if a procedure is defined.

g, mueli

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hammer    |    <mueli@g.o>     |     Graz, AT
Gentoo Developer (Kerberos)  |  http://www.michael-hammer.at