| 1 |
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 07:49:01PM +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 2 |
> --- |
| 3 |
> eclass/toolchain.eclass | 2 +- |
| 4 |
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass |
| 7 |
> index 68e4ce15b37..fe41a80db28 100644 |
| 8 |
> --- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass |
| 9 |
> +++ b/eclass/toolchain.eclass |
| 10 |
> @@ -2207,7 +2207,7 @@ do_gcc_config() { |
| 11 |
> [[ -n ${current_specs} ]] && use_specs=-${current_specs} |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> if [[ -n ${use_specs} ]] && \ |
| 14 |
> - [[ ! -e ${ROOT}/etc/env.d/gcc/${CTARGET}-${GCC_CONFIG_VER}${use_specs} ]] |
| 15 |
> + [[ ! -e ${EROOT}etc/env.d/gcc/${CTARGET}-${GCC_CONFIG_VER}${use_specs} ]] |
| 16 |
${EROOT%/}/etc... would be more portable, correct? Not all EAPI have no |
| 17 |
trailing /. |
| 18 |
> then |
| 19 |
> ewarn "The currently selected specs-specific gcc config," |
| 20 |
> ewarn "${current_specs}, doesn't exist anymore. This is usually" |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> 2.16.1 |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
Archives