| 1 |
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:45:24 -0400 Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:33 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
| > On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:00:59 +0100 Stuart Herbert |
| 5 |
| > <stuart@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
| > | I've created a new project, called Gentoo Seeds [1]. The aim of |
| 7 |
| > | the project is to create stage4 tarballs which can be used to |
| 8 |
| > | 'seed' new boxes with ready-built Gentoo solutions. |
| 9 |
| > |
| 10 |
| > Wouldn't this be considered a wide ranging feature or enhancement to |
| 11 |
| > Gentoo? |
| 12 |
| |
| 13 |
| It doesn't seem to affect a large set of people, it's totally |
| 14 |
| optional, and right now, it's just exploratory. Do we really need to |
| 15 |
| mire it in bureaucracy? I'm honestly asking. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
A GLEP doesn't have to be bureaucracy. It can be nothing more than a |
| 18 |
way of ensuring that the correct technical decisions are made. For a |
| 19 |
project that could end up affecting a lot of people, getting the design |
| 20 |
right and determining exact goals is a very useful first step. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 24 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
Archives