1 |
Roy Marples wrote: |
2 |
> No it's not. bash does not recommend anything of the sort. It just |
3 |
> states what files are optionally used during initialisation. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> What I'm driving at is that you're making claims that things are broken |
6 |
> or recommended when in fact they are not. Try reading some RFC's and |
7 |
> then you'll have a clearer (hopefully!!) understanding of the words MUST |
8 |
> and SHOULD. Also you'll understand that if those words are not present |
9 |
> then it's entirely optional. I fully recommend reading RFC 2131 [1] as |
10 |
> I'm very well acquainted with it and it also provides lots of good |
11 |
> examples of these words :) |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Thanks |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Roy |
16 |
> |
17 |
> [1] http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=2131 |
18 |
> |
19 |
> PS - This does not necessarily mean I think /etc/skel files in /root is |
20 |
> a bad thing, I just think you're going completely the wrong way about |
21 |
> getting this done. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
Roy, thanks for the advice. Obviously I misstated some things. |
25 |
However, man pages and info docs are written in more colloquial language |
26 |
than formal specifications. Anyway, I promise not to beat the dead horse. |
27 |
|
28 |
- John |
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |