Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/*, python-maintained, py3.6-only, no-revdep
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 21:22:29
Message-Id: umu8r7tdj@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/*, python-maintained, py3.6-only, no-revdep by "Michał Górny"
1 >>>>> On Sat, 07 Mar 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
2
3 > Surely, you can claim we could just drop them to maintainer-needed.
4 > What problem does that solve? The package would still miss 3.7 support.
5 > Users will still suffer when we switch the default (if they have any
6 > users, that is). We would still have to last rite them when 3.6 is
7 > gone. What's the gain?
8
9 > Right, let's talk about m-needed. Over 2000 packages already and still
10 > growing. What message does *that* send to the users?
11
12 Sorry, but where have I suggested to drop these packages to m-n?
13
14 > How about the following message: the difference between Gentoo
15 > and Debian stable is that Gentoo doesn't have the 'b'.
16
17 > Finally, what message does it send to our users when developers keep
18 > picking up fights like this? You seem to disagree with my work
19 > on Gentoo, and the only solution you can come up is publicly shaming me?
20 > This isn't 'let's discuss a better solution' kind of mail, this is
21 > 'justify yourself before me, you puny developer, how dare you do things
22 > I don't like'.
23
24 This is neither a fight nor a personal issue. Also, please don't put
25 words in my mouth that I haven't said and never intended to say.
26
27 Ulrich

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies