| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:42 PM Jason Zaman <perfinion@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:17:53PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 4 |
> > >>>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having |
| 7 |
> > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it's |
| 8 |
> > > 'GPL-2-only' or 'GPL-2+'. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > This has been discussed before. There is no such license as GPL-2-only. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Yes there is: |
| 13 |
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html |
| 14 |
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-or-later.html |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Just so everything is clear: Ulrich is just making an extremely |
| 17 |
pedantic point that the there's no version of the GPL-2 license itself |
| 18 |
with the "only" in it. Strange, now that I think about it I don't |
| 19 |
remember a "GPL-2+" license either... |
Archives