| 1 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> posted |
| 2 |
20070929100139.GB14360@g.o, excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Sep 2007 |
| 3 |
12:01:39 +0200: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On 29-09-2007 02:29:21 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: |
| 7 |
>> > Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o> said: |
| 8 |
>> > > It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS |
| 9 |
>> > > EMAIL" header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 |
| 10 |
>> > > does. |
| 11 |
>> > 1. if everybody hates it (full ack btw), why not remove it globally? |
| 12 |
>> Not everybody hates it, and it's there to dissuade users from replying |
| 13 |
>> to Bugzilla mail by hitting reply in the MUA. |
| 14 |
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181172 |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Isn't that tackled suffiently now by setting a bogus reply-to header? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The problem is those replies may contain information of use in fixing the |
| 19 |
bug. If the mail gets null-spaced... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Better to warn upfront that a reply via mail isn't going to have the |
| 22 |
intended results, AND bogus reply-to header it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 26 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 27 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives