| 1 |
Petteri Räty a écrit : |
| 2 |
> Peter Volkov kirjoitti: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> May be we should punt them from the tree? |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Eclasses can't be removed... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Arguably we could specify a time period before they can be removed? This |
| 10 |
is probably GLEP material though :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Maybe we should have a deprecated eclass for showing a common messaged |
| 13 |
> that certain eclasses should not be used. Then deprecated eclasses could |
| 14 |
> be detected by looking if they inherit deprecated. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Maybe we could just extend the eclass API to have a |
| 17 |
DEPRECATED="yyyy-mm-dd" variable at the top of the eclass - which would |
| 18 |
move the burden to the PM - instead of adding yet another eclass (which |
| 19 |
we wouldn't be able to remove :p) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Cheers |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Rémi Cardona |
| 25 |
LRI, INRIA |
| 26 |
remi.cardona@×××.fr |
| 27 |
remi@g.o |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives