| 1 |
> Three points :- |
| 2 |
> 1) systemd - not all gentoo users subscribe to this 'philosophy' .. >but |
| 3 |
>no, I don't want get drawn into debates of yes/no of systemd .. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The article start by saying the points are not just for systemd, even |
| 6 |
though the latter might find the merge more 'needed'... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
>2) "Today, a separate /usr partition already must be mounted by the |
| 9 |
>initramfs during early boot, thus making the justification for a |
| 10 |
>split-off moot." - no, not all gentoo users have an initramfs and |
| 11 |
>need/want one .. so this is a false assumption. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Agreed, this does not apply to Gentoo. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
>3) I still believe there is merit in distinguishing between binaries |
| 16 |
>that can/should be run as root, and those that can/should not. Those |
| 17 |
>that run as root 100% of the time, or use VMs, don't really 'use' linux |
| 18 |
>in the original sense of the OS .. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
/usr/sbin still exists in a merged usr, so I don't get that point... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
>*hides in his bike-shed, awaiting the flaming torches....* |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Don't worry: no troll here. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Damien Levac |
Archives