Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 19:48:21
Message-Id: CAN3Atvq17z2nrXPdn+UaRarm=EF1WH8pShO3BOzopOoGn+1tvg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Arun Raghavan
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote:
> I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git > Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init systems > and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, and it's > good enough for you.
The difference is that while Git is much faster, comes with a very low WTF/secs rate and really forces you to do things the right way, other L*********e software is not and I agree with you on this. my 0.02c ;-)
> -- > Arun Raghavan > http://arunraghavan.net/ > (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) >
-- Fabio Erculiani