1 |
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
2 |
> Also, I think it may be useful for other arch teams (like amd64). One |
3 |
> solution would be to add yet another flag, like amd64-at, but maybe we |
4 |
> can have some better ideas. |
5 |
The problem here is that it becomes extremely messy when more and more |
6 |
arches want the same functionality. 13 common arches, 3 fbsd arches, and |
7 |
lots variations from the Prefix arches. This would take up a LOT of |
8 |
screen space in Bugzilla unfortunately. |
9 |
|
10 |
How about the following instead, going into the status whiteboard: |
11 |
AT:x86:+ |
12 |
AT:x86:- |
13 |
AT:x86:? |
14 |
with the same meanings that you defined. |
15 |
|
16 |
It should be just as easy to search, and you can do it today already. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
20 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
21 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
22 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |