| 1 |
On 17 June 2010 02:01, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
| 2 |
<jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 16-06-2010 16:39, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On 6/16/10 5:33 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> - With these Code of Conduct rules in place how come DevRel |
| 6 |
>>> is not publicly reminding of these rules where necessary? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> I think the initiative is on the offended person's side. If a developer |
| 9 |
>> is being aggressive and needlessly argumentative towards other people, |
| 10 |
>> that's clearly a misconduct. Similarly for aggressive users. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> There is a common misconception here that I feel the need to address. It |
| 13 |
> was never the direct responsibility of the Developer Relations team to |
| 14 |
> "police" the communication mediums nor was it assigned the |
| 15 |
> responsibility to enforce the CoC. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
DevRel is repsonsible for solving conflicts between developers. |
| 18 |
Apparently I am not the only one who expects DevRel to take an active |
| 19 |
role in enforcing the CoC, at least where it concerns inter-developer |
| 20 |
relations. If this is not DevRel's task, then this should be made |
| 21 |
explicit. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> There was a mostly silent agreement between some teams, including |
| 24 |
> DevRel, UserRel, Council and Trustees, that after the Proctors project |
| 25 |
> was terminated, the enforcement of the CoC, including any moderation or |
| 26 |
> banning actions, would fall to the UserRel team. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
This is very worrying. Such things should never be a silent agreement. |
| 29 |
This needs to be open and transparent. This is policy that needs to be |
| 30 |
explicit. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Cheers, |
| 33 |
Ben |
Archives