Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgy Yakovlev <ya@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New SYMLINK_LIB=no migration tool for review
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 22:25:13
Message-Id: 60c9f4d9-3398-1705-3dc4-9ea4539070f6@sysdump.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New SYMLINK_LIB=no migration tool for review by "Michał Górny"
1 I've found couple of issues, or maybe not.
2
3 systemd installs to /usr/lib/systemd (or /lib/systemd since 234)
4 unconditionally.
5 I'm not sure if it's special and should be allowed to do that, but it's
6 the only package on the system (except gcc/$CHOST dir) that has 64-bit
7 libraries and binaries in lib.
8
9 Here is the list of the bugs I've found and opened, maybe you can add
10 them as blockers for #506276
11
12 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627744
13 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627746
14 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628338
15
16
17
18 On 08/12/2017 02:33 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
19 > On śro, 2017-08-02 at 17:58 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
20 >> Hi, everyone.
21 >>
22 >> I've finally gotten around to writing a new tool for migrating amd64
23 >> systems to SYMLINK_LIB=no layout [1]. I've put it in symlink-lib-
24 >> migration [2] repository along with a README. Please review it and give
25 >> it more testing.
26 >
27 > I've pushed two important fixes now:
28 >
29 > a. The tool now processes unowned files as well -- *.{a,la,so} are left
30 > in lib64 (i.e. the symlinks created by db.eclass and alikes) while
31 > everything else goes into lib.
32 >
33 > b. I've fixed cleanup phase to also remove top-level files
34 > and directories that were moved out of lib64. Also, I've fixed it not to
35 > complain about trying to remove non-empty directories.
36 >
37 >
38 >> [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506276
39 >> [2]:https://github.com/mgorny/symlink-lib-migration
40 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] New SYMLINK_LIB=no migration tool for review "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>