Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Justin <jlec@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 18:13:59
Message-Id: 4FC66316.3070800@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by "Aaron W. Swenson"
On 30.05.2012 18:58, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 12:53 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: >> Hi! > >> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> >>> wrote: >>>> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test >>>> the conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though. >>> >>> A mock conversion would probably help with creating >>> procedures/docs/etc as well. It is nice to say that we're "just >>> going to use git" but I think everybody has a slightly different >>> picture of how that is going to work. > >> I recommend having a smallish set of willing alpha/beta testers >> for this. This usually helps with some of the near-edge cases. >> You'll still find a thousand other bugs once things go live for >> everybody. Still, it turns a million into a thousand. It also gives >> you slightly more realistic load test. .... Regards, Tobias > > > As one that's relatively new to Git, I'm a perfect candidate for > testing. If we go this way, I volunteer. > > - Aaron >
As I am a hater of CVS and my current checkout is repeatability spiting weird errors, I would join as a tester here. justin

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature