| 1 |
On 4/17/16 4:15 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 16-04-2016 21:05:56 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Congratulations! You've just committed an invalid dependency that is |
| 4 |
>> going to cause true mayhem on every package using the eclass. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I assume you've taken proper actions to mitigate this. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> But why would anyone send patches for review, or even start wondering |
| 9 |
>> that we might be using USE=libressl all around for some reason... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> While I believe your point is right (patches for review), I think this |
| 12 |
> style of communication is unnecessary. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
In case you haven't been following the other communications regarding |
| 15 |
the matter, the USE flag is not necessary here because ssl-cert.eclass |
| 16 |
does not involve any linking against openssl/libressl. So I'll be |
| 17 |
recommitting the original patch without the slot operator. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The original patch is at |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/eclass/ssl-cert.eclass?id=7a4d6bd5fcb25d8381bc08e20ad6a5c1c80ad78f |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
plus s/:0=/:0/ |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Thanks, |
| 27 |
> Fabian |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 33 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 34 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 35 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 36 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives