| 1 |
* Marijn Schouten (hkBst) (hkBst@g.o) wrote: |
| 2 |
> James Rowe wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Package tests will have been run a -- possibly large -- number of |
| 4 |
> > times when users see them if they are rolled in to the EAPI bump. This |
| 5 |
> > isn't like the current situation of enabling tests and hoping somebody |
| 6 |
> > has run them during testing. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> You conclusion that developers do not run tests is based on nothing. Using |
| 9 |
> RESTRICT=test is not a fix and just hides the problem, so it is not unthinkable |
| 10 |
> that packages with failing tests get to stable. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Well, I didn't suggest using RESTRICT=test so I'm not sure |
| 13 |
I understand your point. That being said while it definitely isn't |
| 14 |
a good result that packages with failing tests have RESTRICT=test set |
| 15 |
those packages aren't going to cause test failures for stable users |
| 16 |
anyway. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
James |
| 21 |
1. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85901 |
Archives